data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc62d/fc62d7960b0de1e8daa5fd7c44ed2a4fb304644a" alt=""
So I've been thinking and have come to a decision: there are some books that I would read and some that I wouldn't re-read. This is one that I wouldn't re-read. I think I may start labeling books as a "re-read" (as in I'd re-read it) and "possibly re-read." If I don't put "re-read" on it, I won't re-read it. I'm going to go label my other posts now, too, if I like them enough.
Let's be clear here; I like to re-read books. The Blue Castle by L.M. Montgomery? I've read it seven or eight times. Pride and Prejudice, The Cheney Duvall series, Dani Ross mysteries, Georgette Heyer's books and literally, hundreds more. So when I give a book a "re-read status," that means I enjoyed it and that it's enjoyable enough to savor more than once.
Anyway, Shannon Hale's book was fine, but just wasn't for me.
Rating: 7/10 (because really it was a good book, even if I didn't like it)
No comments:
Post a Comment